CHIROPRACTIC ADJUSTMENT AND ANTIOXIDANT MARKERS

I recently had a little more time traveling, which has given me the opportunity to catch up on some of my chiropractic research podcasts.

One of the remarkable development of chiropractic research over the last 25 years has been in the basic science department among other places. In particular, while empirically chiropractors and their patients have known for a long time that the manual adjustment is associated with many changes in body chemistry well beyond neuromusculoskeletal markers such as pain reduction and range of motion, trying to document and quantify that has been comparatively lagging behind.

Some of the non-neuromusculoskeletal changes reported by patients often include feeling more energy, sleeping better, feeling less inflamed overall, improved mood and digestion and cognition. While some of those changes are thought to be associated with changes in neurological feedback loops between the brain and the body, this most recent piece of research seems to suggest that there is potentially an additional core biochemical change associated with the chiropractic adjustment, namely the modulation of local free radicals as well as the up regulation of the body's own antioxidant pathways. The research project was unfortunately interrupted by the arrival of the covid pandemic, which did reduce the total sample size of patients, making some of the statistical data a little tough to analyze, however this paper is still a very exciting first step in further investigating how chiropractic care can improve the overall long-term well-being of our patients.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39966844/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35760595/

Processed foods and your health: so much worse than we realized

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550413125003602?via%3Dihub=&utm_source=klaviyo&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=%28Email%20-%20Chris%20Kresser%20General%20News%29%20Chris%27s%20Friday%20Favorites&utm_term=new%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&utm_content=new%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&_kx=ZpXBDTeEF9QJhwDqQXXrImrT_HpFsBz1ZlYMbsx_Vq0.my75y6

In a less overt way than January 1st, many folks are trying to get back on track with a good routine at the beginning of the school year. They're trying to say goodbye to late nights and late mornings, ice cream and fair food. This recently published article in a very solid mainstream medical journal caught my attention in the midst of this process my patients are reporting. Two things primarily caught my eye: the data clearly shows that ultra processed foods are much more harmful than some mainstream reports leads us to believe, that "everything in moderation is okay", and that the effect of ultra processed foods extends way beyond traditional BMI and cardio metabolic health to include depression, thyroid function, fertility, and environmental toxicity markers.

Before we get into further details we should probably briefly review the classification of food according to its level of processing. Depending upon which source you pull up, foods are classified as unprocessed, minimally processed, moderately processed, and ultra processed. (Some classification systems a link minimally processed and moderately processed together). Foods that are minimally processed are things that are cooked, chopped, with very basic added non-chemically manufactured ingredients like salt, water, spices, oil, or fermenting cultures). Think yogurt for example with no sugar added. Or plain cooked canned chickpeas. Foods that ultra processed involve more than one step of basic cooking or fermenting, and the addition of multiple synthetic food additives that are not necessary for processing of food.

https://www.eatrightpro.org/news-center/practice-trends/examining-the-nova-food-classification-system-and-healthfulness-of-ultra-processed-foods

What's quite surprising to a lot of people is how many foods they eat commonly fall into the ultra processed category, foods that they assume are benign or maybe even healthy. High on my hit list are things like crackers, granola bars, breakfast cereals, most commercial breads, and even things like commercial smoothies. Those things are chemical junk bombs, with the list of ingredients more or less unrecognizable past the first one. (Which often is sugar). Beyond that you go into the more traditional ultra processed foods that most people realize they shouldn't be eating, things that come in a box, in a can, but even things like a commercial pastry is an ultra processed food. And it's very clear that unless you go to some sort of farm to table restaurant, pretty much anything you're going to eat out at a restaurant is going to be ultra processed.

Back to the study itself. Most people have a basic understanding that eating ultra processed food can lead to weight gain, and some of the more commonly recognized downstream effects such as cardiac disease. However we would be lucky if the problem stopped there. What was really stunning about the study is that among the various control groups were people who ate an ultra processed dominant diet but with a caloric intake that was very appropriate for their height and weight. Even at a normal caloric intake, people exhibited significant abnormal health markers, indicating that the type of food and the level of processing were a huge part of the problem. Beyond cardio metabolic disease, the study showed a statistically significant change in thyroid levels, (a lot of obese blamed their thyroid function when in reality the type of foods they are eating our causing abnormal thyroid function), significant elevated phthalates (a common chemical byproduct of food packaging, which is much more prevalent and ultra processed food than unprocessed foods obviously), significant changes in testosterone levels in men, sperm count, and FSH in women (a hormone associated with ovulation and fertility).

The bottom line: one of the best things you can do with your diet is to keep you nutrition simple by not trying to buy designer foods, but look at foods in their original format, with one or two ingredients. This does not mean that you cannot take simple hacks that will save you time, such as buying plain precut vegetables or squash, but that ultimately most of your diet needs to come from food in the form that nature provides.


Harmon's first massage blog

Hello! I’m happy to be able to share things I’ve learned about Massage Therapy with you through my first blog ever. I thought a good place to start would be some of the most common questions I get asked by clients. So here we go!

What is a knot in a muscle?

A knot is defined as “a bundle or cluster of muscle fibers or sarcomeres that are contracted and will not release their contraction.”

A sarcomere is the smallest unit of a muscle and is where the “contraction” happens. Clusters (they look like a honeycomb or a hexagonal structure) of these make myofibrils, which make muscle fibers, which make fascicles, which make a muscle “belly”. These bundles or clusters seal themselves off from blood and oxygen in your circulation system and prevents them from releasing.

So why won’t they release their contraction?

The area that has become the knot has used up all the oxygen and energy (ATP) in that region. The pH (acid to base scale 1-14) drops from a neutral pH of 7 or 7.5 to 4 or 4.5 (more acidic) in the surrounding fluid. This acidic state dismantles the neurotransmitter called Acetylcholinesterase which would stop Acetylcholine from stimulating the muscle.

In a less wordy way to explain it - the muscle doesn’t release because it is being told not to. It is being told the opposite and the instructions to stop that command do not arrive.

I’m going to keep these short and digestible for modern day attention spans. I hope you like these and I would love to hear feedback from you. Peace!

WHIPLASH AS A PUBLIC HEALTH EPIDEMIC: A HARD LOOK AT REAL DATA TO CALL IT WHAT IT IS

Whiplash as a public health epidemic: a hard look at real data to call it what it is.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32413544/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32413544/

More recently I have been back on a nerd Safari listening to research podcasts. The most recent series focuses on the career research work of highlighted individuals who happen to have a chiropractic background but later expanded into other health disciplinary approaches. One of the most fascinating individuals in that series is Michael Freeman, third-generation chiropractor who spent the first 12 years of his worklife is a small town chiropractor on the West Coast, later to get a medical degree, public health degree, and multiple specialty additional degrees and certifications in forensics and epidemiology. His initial focus was to better understand the morbidity and mortality of crashes and accidents, especially motor vehicle accidents. I could certainly relate to his dilemma, facing the reality of these low-speed collision injuries in practice, while being told by the "official" date at that such injuries did not really exist.

The space of motor vehicle accident injuries is fraught with conflicting interest. There is certainly a lot of press given to the idea that patients are financially motivated when reporting persistent residuals from injuries, including injuries that happen at relatively low speed and with relatively little vehicle damage (which will be the topic of a subsequent blog). There is also the official statistics from national crash data reporting systems, suggesting that certain types of injuries such as cervical disc prolapses, happen extremely really at low speed collisions. Then again something that conflicts with my observation in 32 years of practice.

The other side of the story is that there is an equal if not higher level of financial motivation on behalf of the payers in the insurance industry. Profit depends upon paying out less in claims than you taken in premiums obviously. And to be fair, I I have seen my share of poor and questionable business practices in some of my colleagues over the last 32 years, who were willing to amplify the treatment needs of people in motor vehicle accidents because you could bill the car insurance company at a higher rate and for more visits than you could a commercial policy. And yet, overwhelmingly, I saw more people with real nasty persistent, difficult to treat and stabilize injuries, that had their benefits cut off long before they had reached the maximum recovery, by insurance claims adjuster hiding themselves behind certain statistics. Some of the statistics never made any sense to clinical providers like myself and my colleagues, and it has taken the hard work of people with strong data background and unquestionable research methodology to counter the narrative put forth by the insurance payers.

Enters Michael Freeman and his work. This particular study focuses on the actual incidence of cervical spine injuries from motor vehicle accidents in the US, using more accurate data from hospital reporting ER visits for motor vehicle injuries to the cervical spine. His research paper also highlights the extreme limitations of the crash reporting data reported by insurance companies, which only look at the first 48 hours of reported injuries following a motor vehicle accident. Unless you're dealing with a fracture, internal bleeding or severe head injury, the majority of people in low to medium speed collision haven't even made it to urgent care 48 hours after the crash: their adrenaline is so high and blocking pain they did not fully capture the level of the injuries, they are overwhelmed trying to figure out their damaged vehicle situation and get replacement wheels to get to work, they're trying to figure out what sort of injury coverage they may have before incurring a huge medical bill etc. Of most interest to me in the study was the discussion about cervical disc injuries. I see those remarkably frequently in collision speeds of 10 miles an hour or less, depending upon other factors associated with the crash such as speed of impact, position of the passenger etc. The official crash statistics tell you they almost never happen, however almost nobody in the low-speed crash will have a cervical MRI in the first 48 hours after an accident, which is the only way to truly diagnose those types of injuries. This is confirmed by Michael Freeman study, which shows that based on hospital statistics alone (and that's even an underestimate of cervical disc injuries since many of them will not have their MRI until they walk into our office three months later with persistent pain from the original accident), 92% of cervical disc injuries are missed by the official crash statistics.

I had the pleasure of listening to an interview by Dr. Freeman recently. In his own words, cervical injuries from motor vehicle accidents are so prevalent, estimated at 1.2 million injuries per year in the US, that we really should think of them as a public health epidemic, considering the morbidity and disability associated with the immediate injury, much less the potential percentage of people who will continue on with chronic persistent symptoms. This certainly resonates with me as a practitioner with a large practice in chronic care management, where people will often show up with a constellation of symptoms that they clearly date back to an original rear end collision 30 years prior.

The moral of the story: whether your patient or doctor, you need to sometimes block off the so-called official statistics, and really look at what your individual situation tells you. If you were in a crash, and within a couple weeks do not develop any symptoms, you're probably not injured. But if you're in an accident, and you start developing pain that is new or unusual for you, regardless of how little scratches you see on the bumper, you need to consider the possibility of an injury and not delay treatment.

Vertigo from the neck or inner ear ? The swivel test

Dizziness and vertigo is one of those problems like fatigue that can make you cringe when it shows up in the office because there are so many possibilities as to what's causing it. Anything from cardiovascular to inner ear to medication to blood pressure to mild head injury etc. However when it comes to positional vertigo that is often triggered by change in position of the head and neck, the two main culprits are going to be the cervical spine in the inner ear and sometimes a combination of both. Most of the time the testing can be a little bit elusive because the testing itself will activate both the cervical spine and the inner ear at the same time. (For example Dixie Hall Pike test). The swivel test can be a useful add-on to other testing because it will hold the head stationary while deeply activating cervical rotation, thus eliminating stimulus to the inner year and vestibular system while deeply stimulating the cervical spine. All you need is a good old-fashioned swivel stool or chair and a good pair of steady hands to hold the head.

ADOLESCENT ATHLETIC MIGRAINES AND FERRITIN

july seems to be the time when of our teens tackle some ruthless sports training camp. I've seen a fair amount of those beat up bodies, full of new muscle bundles and a few injuries, show up for treatment at the office. This flood of athletic teens has reminded me of an important topic I've meant to blog about for a while.

Adolescence seems to be a time when migraine patterns can emerge. Hormones get a lot of the blame, and there is some partial truth to that, although I feel that it's often an easy copout without looking at other causes. (Much less trying to understand hormone imbalance and correct them). Injuries to the cervical thoracic spine, athletic head injuries, and some nutritional deficiencies can also be a huge trigger in genetically predisposed individuals. The good news is that there is some recovery path available. Today I want to talk about one particular subset that affects especially young athletic females. The pattern and distribution of the migraine is similar to other migraine headaches, but the timing seems to often coincide at the end of physical activity, indicating a metabolic trigger to the headaches, as at the end of the menstrual cycle rather than before or during menstruation. Over time however, the temporal correlation to exercise and menstruation becomes less clear as the migraine pattern becomes more frequent.

Migraines can have multiple triggers. One common mechanism among many migraine patients is the drop in available energy production in the central nervous system, since neurons hold a negative charge that requires a lot of continuous energy production in the brain in order to be maintained. If the energy production drops very suddenly, or persistently, the neurons lose their charge and can fire in large patterns, causing a random wave of what's called depolarization that can lead to a migraine.

Energy production in the brain requires several things: stable blood sugar (some people can metabolically adapt to ketone fats as an energy substitute for non-high-intensity activities), adequate blood flow, adequate oxygen concentration, adequate electrolytes balance. So episodes of hypoglycemia and low electrolytes can definitely be a ripe terrain for migraine to spike. I think most teenagers and their parents have already figure that out with pre-exercise electrolyte as well as making sure they've had some sort of preexercise snack.

The contribution of low oxygen concentration however does not seem to be on many people's radar. This happens mostly when a teenager is borderline anemic, or has low iron/low iron reserves. Oxygen concentration in the brain is dependent upon not only the blood flow to the brain but also the amount of oxygen carried by hemoglobin in the red blood cells.

Young athletic females are especially vulnerable to iron deficiency anemia or low iron reserves because of three main factors:

– adolescent females menstruate, often at the time that they pick up the intensity of the athletic activities. They do not necessarily make up the iron loss of menstruation at the time that the need increases. Some of the early periods can be irregular and very heavy too compounding the problem.

– Athletic female teens are increasingly engaging in strength training as part of their sports practice, which is excellent news for the overall health, bone health, and injury resilience. The main protein founded muscle is called myoglobin, which requires a lot of heme iron to manufacture. This is the same heme iron that incorporated into the red blood cell hemoglobin. Practically this means that strength training diverts some of the heme iron resources into muscles and away from red blood cell production, increasing the risk of anemia. This phenomenon has sometimes been referred to as the myoglobin shunt.

– The complex landscape of teenage eating habits, tied into body image, food preferences, and some desire to pursue more vegetarian diets, can often lead to very low content and bioavailability of iron and supporting minerals in the diet.

Assessing an athletic female teenager for the potential of suboptimal iron reserves as a migraine trigger is not as straightforward as you would think. The body is very good at compensating for low iron and maintaining apparently normal routine lab values for a very long time. In order to really assess the iron status, a patient will need a CBC, iron panel including ferritin, which is often the first value to drop before seeing any changes in the red blood cell count. My rule of thumb with our young athletic females is to see a ferritin in the 50 range, to give the margin for fluctuations during the menstrual cycle. Be aware that technically the range of what's considered "normal" ferritin on many of our labs is as low as 10, which is clearly not sufficient for most people much less someone involved in high-intensity athletics.

Restoring normal iron and hemoglobin reserves is also not a straightforward as you would think. Common iron supplements tend to be very irritating to the G.I., resulting in constipation, poor compliance, and not necessarily improving iron levels. My recommendation is to combine more easily absorbable forms of iron with cofactors of copper and zinc, and take them and minimum of twice a day, in smaller doses, and ideally three times a day for the first 30 days until the patient starts feeling better. This obviously should be in addition to changing dietary pattern to have more bioavailable forms of iron for a couple meals a day. In addition, I want to make sure that the athletes is having a pre-workout electrolyte and creatine bolus, and that they have had adequate caloric intake including some healthy form of carbohydrate no more than two hours before an intense exercise session. This will help support sustain energy production for their body and their brain during exercise. Ferritin should also be monitored at six weeks, and 12 weeks, to make sure you adjust the supplement dose into a healthy non-toxic range over time.

VITAMIN D STACKING OVERLOAD

For most of the last 20 years we have been talking to patients about maintaining healthy levels of vitamin D and avoiding deficiencies because of the widespread health ramifications. However more recently we've had a bit of a turnaround in that I have run into several cases of elevated vitamin D levels on blood samples that were in a concerning range. And based on the review of the most recent literature I'm not the only one raising a bit of an alarm.

First it's important to briefly remember your metrics: vitamin D levels below 30 are generally considered insufficient, and vitamin D levels above 80 considered unhealthy high. There is some debate in the medical and integrative space about the upper range, with some groups advocating healthy levels closer to 8 fo certain at-risk populations (autoimmune, active oncology), and the purpose of this blog is not to enter that debate (although my careful review of the issue seems to indicate that something more physiological that humans have experienced over the last 10,000 years based on sun exposure and skin manufacturing of vitamin D would be closer to 60 – 70 as an upper healthy range). But I would like to point out that there is a real risk of overdosing on vitamin D3 if you're taking several supplements at the same time, and not factoring the total vitamin D that may be found in all of them.

Many nutritional supplements sold both professionally and over-the-counter do contain some background level of vitamin D as a synergist, somewhere around 400 IUs on average. The original idea behind the supplementation was that the average person was not getting enough vitamin D and they would roll in a minimum level within a supplement to ensure results. This well-intentioned idea resulted in an unexpected problem over time, as more patients started self administering a variety of supplements for general health and stacking these 400 IU doses of vitamin D. For some of our patients, who are taking a regimen of prescribed supplements for specific goals, such as G.I. restoration, inflammation control etc., That amount could easily get above 10,000. More recently we had a patient whose routine blood level was above 200 (I didn't even think it was possible and had the patient get a second test to rule out or lab error). Looking at the supplementation that I was recommending the total amount she was taking was 6000 IUs, a dose that would never get her anywhere higher than 70 on her vitamin D serum levels. It was really her head scratching mystery for a while, until the patient started looking in her kitchen cabinet at some of the supplements she was taking most days, only to realize that a winter immune support and a hair and skin support she was taking on the side were both stacking over 10,000 IUs combined between those two alone.

The moral of the story: vitamin D supplementation is beneficial for most patients especially in our northern climates, but you have to remember to calculate your total intake. And it's also a great idea to get it measured once a year as part of your annual physical to make sure you're in the ballpark.